The following Review Guidelines are
intended to help service providers and individuals involved in
personnel preparation determine the congruence between the beliefs,
values, and practices of the individuals in your community and
current recommended practices in early childhood/special education.
The Review Guidelines will first help you consider the
overall effectiveness of presentation of a material. Next, questions
follow which pertain specifically to the content area of Child
Guidance and Discipline.
It is important to realize that no material is likely to match
the exact needs of individuals in your community. Therefore, in
many instances, you may wish to make some simple adaptations
to the materials before using them.
A separate set of Review Guidelines is available to help
select materials that have been translated from one language
to another. In addition, other suggestions for choosing materials
are available on the CLAS Web site (http://clas.illinois.edu).
It is our hope that you may use these Review Guidelines
to engage in meaningful dialogue with families and colleagues
in your community, as you decide which materials to use in your
early childhood setting.
Effectiveness
of Presentation
Please
respond to all that apply.
Clarity
- Is the purpose of the material clear?
- Is the presentation of the information easy to follow?
- If there are directions on how to use the material, are they
clearly stated?
- Does the material include an effective explanation of
technical terms or jargon?
- Does the language in the material acknowledge diversity (e.g.,
family structures, multi-generations, disabilities, gender,
ethnicity, socio-economic status, religion, etc.)?
- Is the format (e.g., print, audio, video, etc.) appropriate
for the intended users of this material?
- Are contact agencies or persons for accessing additional information
or support easily identifiable?
Comprehension
Level
- Easy = mainly simple sentences
with minimal or no technical jargon;
- Average = a mix of simple and
complex sentences with some technical jargon (e.g., USA Today);
- Difficult = mainly complex sentences
with a lot of technical jargon or discipline-specific terms
(e.g., College-level text or New York Times).
- For printed materials, the reading level of the material is:
Easy | Average
| Difficult |
N/A
- For video and audio materials, the comprehension level of
the material is:
Easy | Average | Difficult | N/A
Graphics, Illustrations and
Photos
Do the graphics:
- Represent a non-stereotypical view of cultural (e.g., contemporary
dress) and linguistic groups?
- Represent a wide variety of groups (e.g., disabilities, gender,
race, generation)?
- Enhance the materials (e.g., photo prints and designs are
appropriate and of high quality)?
|
Establishing a Healthy Relationship
Between Providers and Families
|
To what extent does the material
- Emphasize the importance of providers and families establishing
a comfortable relationship (e.g., understanding values and
beliefs)?
- Encourage the provision of services in the families
preferred language or through the assistance of a qualified
translator/interpreter who can serve as a cultural mediator?
- Acknowledge the importance of employing service providers
who respect and are knowledgeable about the cultures and languages
of the families served?
- Encourage providers to engage in self-reflection regarding
their role, assumptions, and beliefs and how they may be perceived
by the family (e.g. supportive, interfering, guiding, intrusive)?
- Offer strategies to address conflict or misunderstanding
that may arise between suggested child guidance and discipline
interventions and families preferences?
- Acknowledge the importance of developing a climate of
mutual respect and trust by responding to family concerns as
they arise (e.g., answering questions, providing resources,
changing the intervention program)
- Encourage communication among individuals (e.g., families,
providers) regarding differing views of child guidance and
discipline strategies?
|
Assessment Considerations
|
To what extent does the material
- Encourage an assessment of cultural variation and language
proficiency of the child and family? Providers should use this
information to determine acceptable child guidance and discipline
practices.
- Encourage providers to determine causes for or functions of
problem behavior that may be an alternative means of communication
due to language difficulties, cultural or class differences,
or developmental variation?
- Provide for a functional analysis of the problem behavior?
This includes an assessment of (1) the function the behavior
serves for the child and (2) the environmental or biological
events that precede and follow the target behavior.
To what extent
- Does the material assist families and providers in determining
which child behaviors require intervention?
- Does the material emphasize the importance of ongoing family
participation in the development of child guidance and discipline
strategies?
- Does the material acknowledge that multiple members of the
family, school, and community (e.g., parents, siblings, grandparents,
extended family, teachers, assistants) may be involved in
implementing the child guidance and discipline strategies?
- Does the material emphasize ways to come to agreement on appropriate
strategies that are acceptable to all implementors, especially
to the primary care provider?
- Are the directions for implementing the child guidance and
discipline strategies clear for families and providers?
- Does the material encourage providers and family members to
focus on the function (effect or impact) of the behavior exhibited
by the child (e.g., does it function to access attention
or to escape/avoid an unpleasant task?)?
- Are the terms used to describe the approach technically accurate
(e.g., modeling, re-directing, time-out, ignoring, reinforcement)
and understandable to all providers and family members?
- Does the material offer several alternative strategies for
responding to problem behavior, beginning with the least intrusive
(prevention) and then moving to gradually more intrusive (e.g.,
re-direction or reinforcing appropriate behavior, extinction/ignoring,
time-out, and response cost)?
- Does the approach to child guidance and discipline take into
account the environment in which the family lives (e.g.,
living space, safety considera-tions) and in which the child
guidance and discipline strategies will be delivered (e.g.,
home, school, community)? Strategies should be environmentally
sensitive and may vary according to setting.
- Are rationales provided for all strategies described in the
material as well as examples of how and when alternative strategies
might be selected?
- Does the material provide alternatives to physical or other
adversive punishment?
To what extent does the material
- Identify potential short-term outcomes for both the caregiver
and/or the child?
- Identify potential long-term outcomes for both the caregiver
and/or the child?
- Specify the cultural and linguistic groups with whom the approach
has been used?
|
Evaluating Impact and Appropriateness
of Intervention and Services
|
To what extent does the material
- Encourage providers to systematically evaluate the appropriateness
of the interventions with families based on their changing needs
and preferences?
- Suggest ways of ensuring that outcomes are important and meaningful
to the families as well as the service providers?
- Include a variety of options for gathering information from
families (e.g., interviews, observations, checklists, etc.)
that respect families cultural and linguistic background
and considers families level of acculturation?
The following two questions are intended
to deepen the analysis of the ways materials address issues
of diversity. In some cases, these issues may have been addressed
in the preceding questions. |
|
Does
the material acknowledge and address complex and sometimes
subtle aspects of diversity as they relate to
child guidance and discipline, such as:
|
- Power (refers to the division of members of society
into levels with unequal access to resources, knowledge, and
authority)
- Racism (refers to systems advantage based on race)
- Prejudice (refers to an adverse judgment or opinion
based on preconceived beliefs and ideas about different groups)
- Socio-Economic Class (refers to the division of society
into levels with unequal wealth and prestige)
|
Are
there any spoken or unspoken assumptions, values, or beliefs
in this material that could conflict with the delivery of
culturally and linguistically appropriate services (e.g.,
assuming all parents view themselves as advocates or equal
partners)?
|