The following
Review Guidelines
are intended to help service providers and individuals involved in personnel
preparation determine the congruence between the beliefs, values, and
practices of the individuals in your community and current recommended
practices in early childhood/special education. The
Review Guidelines
will first help you consider the overall effectiveness of presentation
of a material. Next, questions follow which pertain specifically to the
content area of
Family Information Gathering.
It is important to realize that no material is likely to match the
exact needs of individuals in your community. Therefore, in many instances,
you may wish to make some simple adaptations to the materials
before using them.
A separate set of Review Guidelines is available to help select
materials that have been translated from one language to another.
In addition, other suggestions for choosing materials are available
on the CLAS Web site (http://clas.illinois.edu).
It is our hope that you may use these Review Guidelines to engage
in meaningful dialogue with families and colleagues in your community,
as you decide which materials to use in your early childhood setting.
Effectiveness
of Presentation
Please
respond to all that apply.
Clarity
- Is the purpose of the material clear?
- Is the presentation of the information easy to follow?
- If there are directions on how to use the material, are they clearly
stated?
- Does the material include an effective explanation of technical
terms or jargon?
- Does the language in the material acknowledge diversity (e.g., family
structures, multi-generations, disabilities, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic
status, religion, etc.)?
- Is the format (e.g., print, audio, video, etc.) appropriate for
the intended users of this material?
- Are contact agencies or persons for accessing additional information
or support easily identifiable?
Comprehension
Level
- Easy = mainly simple sentences with
minimal or no technical jargon;
- Average = a mix of simple and complex
sentences with some technical jargon (e.g., USA Today);
- Difficult = mainly complex sentences
with a lot of technical jargon or discipline-specific terms (e.g.,
College-level text or New York Times).
- For printed materials, the reading level of the material is:
Easy | Average |
Difficult | N/A
- For video and audio materials, the comprehension level of the material
is:
Easy | Average | Difficult | N/A
Graphics,
Illustrations and Photos
Do the graphics:
- Represent a non-stereotypical view of cultural (e.g., contemporary
dress) and linguistic groups?
- Represent a wide variety of groups (e.g., disabilities, gender,
race, generation)?
- Enhance the materials (e.g., photo prints and designs are appropriate
and of high quality)?
|
Establishing a Healthy Relationship
Between Providers and Families
|
To what extent does the material
- Emphasize the importance of providers and families establishing
a comfortable relationship prior to gathering information (e.g.,
understanding values and beliefs)?
- Provide strategies for developing a collaborative and supportive
relationship between service providers and family members?
- Acknowledge the importance of employing service providers who
respect and are knowledgeable about the cultures and languages of
the families served?
- Encourage the provision of services in the families' preferred language
or through the assistance of a qualified translator/interpreter who
can serve as a cultural mediator?
- Encourage providers to engage in self-reflection regarding their
role, assumptions, and beliefs and how they may be perceived by the
family (e.g., supportive, interfering, guiding, intrusive)?
- Encourage service providers to clarify their role with families
and to gather information regarding family expectations?
- Offer strategies to address conflict or misunderstanding that may
arise between the family information gathering process and families'
preferences?
- Acknowledge the importance of developing a climate of mutual respect
and trust by responding to family concerns as they arise?
- Acknowledge that families have a range of beliefs and practices
that influence their attitudes toward services and family information
gathering efforts?
- Emphasize the need to understand the important role that communication
styles (e.g., eye contact, slang/colloquial expressions, and body
language) may play in family information gathering?
|
Tools, Instruments, and Procedures
|
To what extent does the material
- The material acknowledge that family information gathering is a
voluntary activity for families?
- The material acknowledge that family members may differ in their
availability or desire to participate in the family information gathering
process, which may increase or decrease?
- The material acknowledge that some families may view the use of
family information gathering tools as an invasion of privacy or as
threatening or demeaning?
- The material advocate family information gathering procedures that
are non-intrusive, non-judgmental, and conducted with sensitivity?
- The material provide a variety of strategies (e.g., interviews,
observations, tools, and instruments) to gather information about
families' resources, priorities, and concerns?
- The material acknowledge that the family information gathering
process should be ongoing, interactive, and adaptable to the family's
changing needs, priorities, and concerns?
- The material suggest that providers should select initial information
gathering strategies that are comfortable for families (e.g., open-ended
strategies and techniques for new families)?
- The material encourage service providers to consider the reading
and comprehension abilities of family members when selecting family
information gathering tools?
- The material address biases that may exist in family information
gathering instruments (e.g., they have been used primarily with
middle to higher SES groups)?
- The material acknowledge that family information gathering should
help providers understand and better appreciate the complex ecology
of families (e.g., culture, neighborhoods, friends, extended family,
and organizations)?
- The material encourage providers to identify and use supports that
already exist in each family's environment (e.g., neighborhoods,
friends, extended family, and organizations)?
|
Using Information Gathered from Families
|
To what extent does the material
- Indicate that the information obtained from the family should assist
in finding resources for the family and/or developing programs for
the child/family?
- Provide strategies for establishing family goals related to their
childs development and family function?
- Acknowledge the need to identify the supports and services necessary
to enhance the familys capacity to meet the changing developmental
needs of their child?
- Acknowledge that the family information gathering process should
address the changing needs and preferences of the child and family
over time?
- Advocate that bicultural/bilingual individuals (e.g., parent
liaisons, community members, etc.) are available to assist in
interpreting the findings within the context of the familys
community?
|
Evaluating Impact and Appropriateness
of the Family Information Gathering Tools, Instruments, and Procedures
|
To what extent does the material
- Encourage providers to systematically evaluate the appropriateness
of the family information gathering tools, instruments, and procedures
with families based on their changing needs and preferences?
- Suggest ways of ensuring that outcomes are important and meaningful
to the families as well as the service providers?
- Include a variety of options for gathering information from families
(e.g., interviews, observations, checklists, etc.) that respect
families cultural and linguistic background and consider families
level of acculturation?
- Specify the cultural and linguistic groups with whom the family
information gathering tool or instrument has been used?
The following two questions are intended to
deepen the analysis of the ways materials address issues of diversity.
In some cases, these issues may have been addressed in the preceding
questions. |
|
Does
the material acknowledge and address complex and sometimes subtle
aspects of diversity as they relate to
family information gathering, such
as:
|
- Power (refers to the division of members of society into
levels with unequal access to resources, knowledge, and authority)
- Racism (refers to systems advantage based on race)
- Prejudice (refers to an adverse judgment or opinion based
on preconceived beliefs and ideas about different groups)
- Socio-Economic Class (refers to the division of society
into levels with unequal wealth and prestige)
|
Are
there any spoken or unspoken assumptions, values, or beliefs in
this material that could conflict with the delivery of culturally
and linguistically appropriate services (e.g., assuming all parents
view themselves as advocates or equal partners)?
|