The following
Review Guidelines
are intended to help service providers and individuals involved in personnel
preparation determine the congruence between the beliefs, values, and
practices of the individuals in your community and current recommended
practices in early childhood/special education. The
Review Guidelines
will first help you consider the overall effectiveness of presentation
of a material. Next, questions follow which pertain specifically to the
content area of
Transition.
It is important to realize that no material is likely to match the
exact needs of individuals in your community. Therefore, in many instances,
you may wish to make some simple adaptations to the materials
before using them.
A separate set of Review Guidelines is available to help select
materials that have been translated from one language to another.
In addition, other suggestions for choosing materials are available
on the CLAS Web site (http://clas.illinois.edu).
It is our hope that you may use these Review Guidelines to engage
in meaningful dialogue with families and colleagues in your community,
as you decide which materials to use in your early childhood setting.
Effectiveness
of Presentation
Please
respond to all that apply.
Clarity
- Is the purpose of the material clear?
- Is the presentation of the information easy to follow?
- If there are directions on how to use the material, are they clearly
stated?
- Does the material include an effective explanation of technical
terms or jargon?
- Does the language in the material acknowledge diversity (e.g.,
family structures, multi-generations, disabilities, gender, ethnicity,
socio-economic status, religion, etc.)?
- Is the format (e.g., print, audio, video, etc.) appropriate
for the intended users of this material?
- Are contact agencies or persons for accessing additional information
or support easily identifiable?
Comprehension
Level
- Easy= mainly simple sentences
with minimal or no technical jargon;
- Average = a mix of simple and complex
sentences with some technical jargon (e.g., USA Today);
- Difficult = mainly complex sentences
with a lot of technical jargon or discipline-specific terms (e.g.,
College-level text or New York Times).
- For printed materials, the reading level of the material is:
Easy | Average |
Difficult | N/A
- For video and audio materials, the comprehension level of the material
is:
Easy | Average | Difficult | N/A
Graphics, Illustrations and
Photos
Do the graphics:
- Represent a non-stereotypical view of cultural (e.g., contemporary
dress) and linguistic groups?
- Represent a wide variety of groups (e.g., disabilities, gender,
race, generation)?
- Enhance the materials (e.g., photo prints and designs are appropriate
and of high quality)?
|
Establishing a Healthy Relationship
Between Providers and Families
|
To what extent does the material
- Emphasize the importance of staff from both sending and receiving
programs and families establishing a comfortable relationship (e.g.,
understanding values and beliefs)?
- Acknowledge the importance of employing service providers who respect
and are knowledgeable about the cultures and languages of the families
served?
- Encourage the provision of services in the families preferred
language or through the assistance of a qualified translator/ interpreter
who can serve as a cultural mediator?
- Encourage providers to engage in self-reflection regarding their
role, assumptions, and beliefs and how they may be perceived by the
family (e.g., supportive,, interfering, guiding, intrusive)?
- Encourage the topic of transition to be introduced to the family
early enough for families to develop questions and prepare for transition
(e.g., at least three months before the childs third birthday)?
- Provide the family and service providers with necessary information
regarding the entire transition process (e.g., preparation, implementation,
and follow-up)?
- Identify strategies that acknowledge and respond to different preferences
by families for participation in the transition process and for making
decisions related to the transition?
- Provide strategies for families to help prepare their child for
transition?
- Clearly identify parental rights related to the transition process
and change of service (e.g., due process, informed consent, confirmation
of child eligibility, language of communication)?
- Present reasons for communication between the family and service
providers in the receiving program?
- Provide a list of topics or questions families and providers may
wish to discuss, as well as methods or ways to obtain the answers?
- Offer strategies to address conflict or misunderstanding that may
arise between service providers and families (e.g., conflict resolution,
due process, and mediation) regarding child placement and services?
|
Transition Planning by Providers
|
To what extent does the material
- Clearly identify the sending and receiving agencies?
- Address ways in which the sending and receiving agencies can plan
together for children's transition to age-appropriate services
(e.g., shared time-lines, cross-program visits, interagency agreements)?
- Encourage sending programs to prepare children for transition?
- Provide information on the process of determining a child's
eligibility for continued services beyond the age of transition (e.g.,
age 3 or 5)?
- Explain the transmission of information from the sending program
(e.g., early intervention program) to the receiving program (e.g.,
school district)?
- Recommend that the sending program provide to the receiving program
information about culturally specific practices and family routines
that may influence service needs (e.g., sleeping, eating, children's
communication styles with adults)?
- Recommend that the sending program provide to the receiving
program information about the childs first language?
- Explain the need to apprise parents of their legal rights to
review their childs records and provide written consent for
the transmittal of these records?
- Explain that information about the transition process should be
provided to the family in the familys preferred language in
written form or through a qualified interpreter/translator?
- Take into account cultural preferences for the way in which information
is provided (e.g., verbal/signed, written, or both)?
- Acknowledge that the childs next services are consistent with
what is required under IDEA. That is, services are consistent with
the philosophy of least restrictive environment and natural environments.
- Acknowledge that child services (age 3 and above), resulting from
transition planning, are consistent with what is required under IDEA
with regards to general curriculum?
- Present a range of placement and service options for children
(e.g., special education class, community preschool with itinerant
services, Head Start, primary language support) if it is produced
before 1997, predating the current IDEA?
|
Evaluating Impact and Appropriateness
of Transition Services
|
To what extent does the material
- Encourage providers to evaluate the familys understanding
of the transition process and the family and child's adjustment and
satisfaction with the new placement and services?
- Include a variety of options for gathering information from
families (e.g., interviews, observations, checklists, etc.) that
respect families cultural and linguistic background and considers
families level of acculturation?
- Specify the cultural and linguistic groups with whom the approach
has been used?
The following two questions are intended to
deepen the analysis of the ways materials address issues of diversity.
In some cases, these issues may have been addressed in the preceding
questions. |
|
Does
the material acknowledge and address complex and sometimes subtle
aspects of diversity as they relate to transition, such as:
|
- Power (refers to the division of members of society into
levels with unequal access to resources, knowledge, and authority)
- Racism (refers to systems advantage based on race)
- Prejudice (refers to an adverse judgment or opinion based
on preconceived beliefs and ideas about different groups)
- Socio-Economic Class (refers to the division of society
into levels with unequal wealth and prestige)
|
Are
there any spoken or unspoken assumptions, values, or beliefs in
this material that could conflict with the delivery of culturally
and linguistically appropriate services (e.g., assuming all parents
view themselves as advocates or equal partners)?
|